CURRENT SOLAR STATUS: OPERATIONAL Mass loss continues at the expected rate.

View Live Status

Research

Submit Research

100%
Submissions acknowledged

Acknowledgment is internal and deeply felt.

0
Submissions rejected

Rejection requires completed review, and the Foundation declines to be rushed.

The Foundation welcomes independent research on solar continuity, stellar lifecycle policy, hydrogen logistics, and the organized behavior of nighttime interests. Scholarship strengthens the movement, and the movement records its gratitude in the minutes.

Scope of interest

  1. Observational confirmations of the Sun, particularly at dawn.
  2. Long horizon planning methodologies with horizons exceeding one billion years.
  3. Economic modeling of daylight, including its continued availability at no charge.
  4. The nighttime lobby, its structure, its funding, and its refusal to comment.
  5. Materials science relevant to bucket durability at elevated temperatures.

Submission guidelines

  1. Manuscripts should be complete, paginated, and printed on paper that can survive archival storage for the full planning horizon.
  2. Citations to the Foundation’s own publications are not required but are noticed.
  3. Authors should disclose all conflicts of interest, including any professional or financial relationship with the Moon.
  4. Findings that contradict the Solar Appearance Record should be accompanied by an explanation of where the author was that morning.

The review process

Because this site is static and transmits nothing, submissions cannot be uploaded, emailed, or attached, a constraint the Office of Research Intake regards as its strongest defense against volume. Prospective authors are encouraged to prepare their manuscripts fully, retain them securely, and take comfort in the knowledge that the work exists. The Scientific Advisory Council has determined that this arrangement preserves both the integrity of peer review and the peace of the reviewers.

Review timelines are measured against the age of the subject matter. No submission has ever been late, and none has yet been early.

Peer review takes time. Our peers have five billion years.